A Shocking Scene in the Supreme Court
In a dramatic incident inside the Supreme Court, suspended lawyer Rakesh Kishore created chaos when he allegedly attempted to hurl a shoe toward Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai. The incident took place during a hearing related to the reconstruction of a Lord Vishnu idol in Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh. Kishore later stated that he had “no regrets” about his actions, claiming it was an act of protest to defend his religious beliefs.
Why the Lawyer Targeted CJI BR Gavai
According to Kishore, the outburst came after remarks made by the CJI while dismissing his plea regarding the Vishnu idol. He claimed that the court’s comments had “hurt the sentiments of Sanatan Dharma followers” and were “an insult to the divine”.
In a statement to the media, Kishore said, “I acted out of emotion. The remarks were deeply disrespectful to my faith. I do not regret what I did.”
The Bar Council of India (BCI) has taken swift action and suspended his legal license, citing misconduct and a grave violation of courtroom decorum.
The Court’s Response to the Unusual Outburst
Eyewitnesses report that the Supreme Court’s security staff immediately intervened as Kishore created a commotion. He was swiftly removed from the courtroom and detained for questioning. Sources say the CJI remained calm and did not react during the incident, instructing officials to handle the matter as per legal protocol.
The Supreme Court Bar Association also condemned the act, calling it “unacceptable and disrespectful to the sanctity of the court”. They emphasized that such behavior undermines the integrity of India’s judiciary system.
Legal Experts React to the Controversy
Legal experts have expressed strong disapproval of Kishore’s conduct. Senior advocate Rajeev Dhawan commented, “Freedom of expression doesn’t justify physical aggression in court. Lawyers are expected to uphold respect for the judiciary, even when they disagree.”
Other lawyers have echoed similar sentiments, stating that while dissent is part of democracy, there are lawful ways to raise objections. The act, they said, only damages public confidence in legal professionals.
What This Incident Means for India’s Judiciary
The shocking incident has raised questions about the increasing frustration among individuals toward court decisions. While rare, such outbursts highlight the importance of maintaining composure and respect within the judicial framework.
It also opens discussions about ethics in legal practice, and the fine line between protest and misconduct.
What Happens Next for Rakesh Kishore
With his suspension in place, Kishore faces an uncertain future. The Bar Council may consider permanent disbarment after reviewing his explanation. Legal observers believe he could also face criminal charges for disorderly conduct inside the Supreme Court.
Despite this, Kishore maintains that he acted “in defense of faith” and does not plan to apologize.
Final Thoughts
This shocking incident serves as a reminder that anger and belief must never override respect for law and order. The judiciary represents the highest pillar of justice, and such acts only harm the credibility of those within the legal community. As the investigation continues, the nation watches closely to see what disciplinary actions follow.
